Zenithstar 61 vs redcat 51. Is the Zenithstar 61 a good telescope? It's pretty good.
Zenithstar 61 vs redcat 51 The candidates are; WO v2-U RedCat 51 APO WO Zenithstar 61 II APO WO Zenithstar 73 III APO WO Zeniths Dec 6, 2019 · In a sense, the RedCat 51 series is a hybrid between a telescope and a manual-focus camera lens. I really wanted to go for this. Dec 5, 2019 · The Aura Carver 10. Light gathering capability of 72mm vs 61(60)mm is immediately visible. The price difference between these two OTAs is close enough that I would wait to buy the RC51 if it is that much better. Im wanting to capture nebulae, as many as possible but it seems Im most interested in diffuse nebulae. Full-Frame Image Circle. Astro-tech AT60ED + Astro-tech 0. Any ideas which is better? I mainly want to take shots of deep sky objects like M44 and M3 ect Feb 3, 2024 · If you were to buy a William Optics Zenithstar, or possibly a Redcat, which would you buy and why? I'm looking at the range and curious to find out why they're all fairly close in price and size. Im a beginner, and I cant choose between Zenithstar 61 + its Flattener or Redcat 51? Which one would you choose and why? Another question, will I need something like the Stellarvue 9x50 Finder Scope? Feb 18, 2022 · Thanks to the popularity of the RedCat 51, William Optics recently launched the RedCat 71 for those looking for a bit more focal length while keeping some of the features that made the RedCat brand so desirable. I rocked a Zenithstar 61ii on a Star Adventurer and it performed quite well. Sep 16, 2017 · Images by James Yang using a full-frame Canon 6D and the Zenithstar 61 APO. Is the Zenithstar 61 a good telescope? It's pretty good. F/5. What do you all think? Is this a good setup for a moderately experienced person wanting to take good deep sky photos? Nov 21, 2020 · SharpStar 61 EDPHII / Radian Raptor 61. There is also Askar 400-500-600 similar to the GT71 & GT81. The colors are vibrant, and the build quality is solid, but the Carver isn't without a few quirks. Its all working very nicely but I was wandering if anyone uses the same kinda setup but with a Zenithstar 71? the weight capacity is in limit for the iOptron but just thought Id ask. The Redcat would also be a little more portable. The redcat will have slightly better correction, but the Z61 has a bit more aperture. The William Optics Zenithstar 61 currently retails for $398 USD. Looking to upgrade from Samyang 135mm F2. 5 bare, F/4. Looks like FRA300 will be more picky regarding to back focus. You really cannot go wrong with either scope. F/4. Below is 17 hours on M3 and the CA horrible. 9 focal ratio, this telescope offers sharp, detailed views across a wide Sep 9, 2019 · I'm a beginner, and I can't choose between Zenithstar 61 + its Flattener or Redcat 51? Which one would you choose and why? Another question, will I need something like the Stellarvue 9x50 Finder Scope? not sure if the doublet can match the petzval 4 element design. Can you pull the reducer out of the Raptor if you want to, or is that permanent? William Optics RedCat 51 / SpaceCat / NightCat. Since then, the RedCat 71 has been introduced to the market, and now, the RedCat 61 - a new take on the entire RedCat design. 43 lb Approx. He's so annoyed the he's considering selling the Z61 for the RC51. Advice I am looking for a beginner ap setup for wide field that can last me a long time. I understand these two to be optically equivalent, so really it's just comparing prices and features in the different packages you find. I've narrowed it down to 3, the Rokinon/Samyang 135mm F2, the William Optics RedCat 51 or the Wiliam Optics Zenithstar 61 (with flat 61 field flattener). From my research, they all cost about the same, Z61 w/ bag, dovetail, field flattener, and T mount & Redcat w/ bags, dovetail and T mount. 9 lb Approx. Sep 4, 2019 · The redcat comes with a flat field of view whilst the zenithstar requires a field flattener. I want something portable, easy to use and does not require much setup time, so I have narrowed down my choice to the Zenithstar 61 and Redcat 51, as they match my requirements pretty well. It is the cheapest, has the perfect focal length, nice focuser an good build quality. It just works out of the box. Feb 7, 2020 · Redcat 51 vs Astro-tech AT60ED - posted in Refractors : Hi, Im new here and to this hobby. Aug 25, 2024 · Getting ready to buy a Redcat 61, but considering 51 vs 61 (new WIFD models), which do you recommend? There's a 50mm FL difference and size/weight difference, but if it were you , which would you recommend? The Redcat is better for widefield shots, because of it's faster optics and wider fov. An Affordable Imaging Refractor. This includes everything from a color-matched dovetail plate to the photo adapter With its sleek, robust design and innovative optical system, the Redcat 51 WIFD delivers crystal-clear, vibrant images, capturing the splendor of the cosmos with ease and precision. 5 with reducer. 9 5. I know there is a difference in focal length and Apr 12, 2021 · Redcat or Zenithstar 71? - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Hi all, Im currently using a redcat 51 with a Canon 750D (modded) and iOptron sky guider pro. If you had to pick, which would you get? and Why? if you Dec 19, 2021 · Evostar 72ed vs Redcat 51 vs Zenithstar 73 iii - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Im needing advice on what scope to get, Ill be getting the Heq5 Pro and using my Nikon D7500 and will upgrade to a dedicated camera later on. When I speak of field curvature I am talking about visual. One thing you can do is go onto Astrobin and search by equipment to see the types of shots people have got with both. The color correction and image sharpness may exceed that of many camera lenses, which makes the RedCat ideal for terrestrial daylight photography and visual imaging of birds, wildlife, and landscapes. And it bothers me a lot. At this point both optical systems are roughly the same price, but the Z61 gives me slightly more aperture, drops down to f/5. But now I came across Askar astrograph. This blog post delves into a detailed comparison o Nov 12, 2021 · WO Redcat 71 vs GT-81 vs FLT-91 - posted in Refractors : hi! I am looking for opinions. But I went with the Redcat and I'm liking it a lot. Jul 6, 2022 · This FRA300 seems interesting. I also think I have some tilt as well. Redcat 61 APO WIFD FL- 300mm /f 4. Looking to upgrade from a Redcat 51 to a higher aperture and longer FL, but keeping Jun 14, 2023 · William Optics led by example with the RedCat 51 and revolutionized astrophotography for all skill levels. I know that a lot of folks who used the original RedCat 51 were a little disappointed with the 43mm image circle. Like DirtyRod, I 3d printed my focuser, but based in Jun 2, 2023 · The profile of RedCat 61 is substantially larger than the RedCat 51, which makes it less travel-friendly. RedCat 51 In the realm of astrophotography, choosing the right telescope can significantly impact your celestial imaging endeavors. I am looking at: Redcat 51 APO WIFD (Gen 3) FL- 250mm /f 4. 9 and retains the rack and pinion focuser. William Optics RedCat 51 (Upgraded Version) + William Optics 48mm T-mount for Sony E-mount 2. Aug 19, 2023 · Exploring Astrophotography: SharpStar 61 vs. I have a budget of around £750/$1000 for a lens an all three fit within the Apr 26, 2020 · Hi all I’m looking for a good telescope for astrophotography to use with my Canon EOS M50 I’ve narrowed it down to the Redcat 51 and the Zenithstar 73. Sep 9, 2019 · not sure if the doublet can match the petzval 4 element design. May 15, 2019 · The OP speaks of 90% visual. The optics appear to be superb on the Redcat, but the Zenithstar has 30% more aperture. The Redcat is a telephoto lens-telescope hybrid, I have it and really like it. The RedCat 71 provides a focal length very similar to the ZenithStar 61, but with the unique “2-1-1” 4 element optical Mar 6, 2022 · Sharpstar 61 or Redcat 51 - posted in Refractors : I currently have the Evostar 72ED and the CA and halos are really bothering me. I have been doing some research on small refractors and have come down to these 2 options: 1. Dec 17, 2023 · Page 1 of 2 - Redcat 51 (Gen 3), Redcat 61 (Gen 3), and Askar 300 Pro APO - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Decisions, Decisions, Decisions. The features itself are great, focus is superb with the Bhatinov mask included and is stable all night. 9 3. Apr 22, 2020 · My Redcat 51 on the other hand is both much sharper than his Z61, it NEVER LOSES FOCUS, even across multiple nights (his Z61 has to refocus every few hours) and it can EASILY capture all the classic DSOs in their full glory. 9 The Sharpstar 61 is reported to have chromatic aberration issues which could be caused by the reducer or just a bad quality objective lens, despite being a triplet. Don't get me wrong, the building quality of 60ed clones is very, very good. Highlights: Exceptional Optical Quality: Boasting a Petzval-like design and a fast f/4. Been looking around a lot and my first option was the Redcat 51 II. 1" HD Digital Frame is a great way to put your portfolio on display and a great way to surface forgotten memories. But I have read so many threads about really bad CA on the II version with the reducer! Zenithstar 61 vs redcat 51 . Sep 7, 2019 · Zenithstar 61 or Redcat 51? - posted in Equipment (No astrophotography): I have Nikon D850 & iOptron SkyGuider Pro (with iPolar), will also get the Optolong L-eNhance filter. I have opportunity for field work, but I enjoy the easiness of doing this from my backyard and controlling the session from my living room. Another thing. 8x field flattener (no stock currently) + William Optics 48mm T-mount for Sony E Apr 12, 2020 · For the telescope, I'm torn between a WO Redcat 51, and the WO Zenithstar 73. So the ZS61 will be slightly better for smaller objects. I live in Australia and scopes seem to be much more limited here I'm looking to get into deep sky DSLR astrophotography with my Canon 600d/T3i and I'm stumped on choosing a lens. Also was looking at other William optics refractors like GT71 and GT81 for future updates. Among the options available, the SharpStar 61 and RedCat 51 stand out as compelling choices. May 26, 2022 · I don't have an opinion on the z61 vs redcat, both have their pluses and minuses, the redcat will probably offer the better sharpness and aberration correction. Nov 20, 2021 · WO RedCat WO Zenithstar 61 II with reducer. $900. The price includes the telescope only, as you can add a number of extras to your order. . For astrophotography, you will want a Zenithstar and a corresponding flattener which is $700 together, same price as the Redcat. Redcat is 51mm /250mm Askar 60mm/300mm. What I tried to say is that cheap SW is not far behind . OK, I want to get a wide field scope. I image mainly from a Bortle 9 sky. Since the whole optical block on the Redcat moves as a single unit, just correct back focus by focusing near/far. It doesn't actually use FPL-53 glass either - it uses an unspecified ED glass as per the manufacturer's description. The FOVs of these three scopes is very similar. 61EDPH II: triplet FPL51. vjwro ujl butv lwlebs howju scjw wixionq bwfpqc rqddza lmbdi