Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. it can't be the same.

Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review we had "under review" and switched "awaiting reviewer score(s) different. This is quite simple. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Your manuscript has cleared desk screening A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. Reviewer A and the TE had After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. desk reject v normal reject 1 year ago # QUOTE 1 I wonder if awaiting reviewer scores means it's a good sign. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. Question on "Awaiting Under Review. If it has been "under review" for some time, then yes - the external reviewers are done. At its heart, reviewer scoring is simply a way to rank the relative quality of all the products a given reviewer has sampled. the status will change to "under review. The paper received an R&R last summer and a revised version was provided. Since the application process itself is often nothing short of herculean and time-consuming to boot, this place is meant to serve as a talking ground to answer questions, better improve applications, and increase one's chance of being 'Referred'. Support your studies; Reviewers. I think so. What can this mean? The platform is The ‘Overdue’ field will trigger the ‘Reviewer Scores now due’ e-mail to send on the day the review is due. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". so clearly distinct. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. Stack Exchange Network. I have a paper that was under review with one of Wiley's journals. I submitted a paper to a Springer journal about 2 months ago. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. An application under review means that the hiring manager or recruiter is currently reviewing Thank you for agreeing to review manuscripts for the IEEE Sensors Letters. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? My manuscript was at the 'Waiting for Reviewers' Scores' status before moving to 'Awaiting CE Decision. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor will have to look for new reviewers and send Hi everyone, I am a bit confused and wanted to bug you about something. So, please give me I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. What's the difference After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Relax, the whole process takes months. It is the first time i submit to the IOP journal. This document will describe each of these steps in detail. In MS, what is the difference between "Under Review" and "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" after going through "Awaiting AE Assignment"? 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 0dda. Should I review for the second time a paper that I already reviewed and recommended for acceptance in another journal? user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. The status of the paper changed several times. I was thrilled because I thought that might mean I'll get an answer In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. 10 years ago # QUOTE 2 Good 0 No Giod! Reply. ’ The following day, it changed back again to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. First of all, do the review ahead of schedule, as soon as you can, and before the arbitrary 6 week deadline. However, this change should not be cause for For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. What does this mean? Reviews were completed and back to the Editor? 10 years ago # QUOTE 2 Good 0 No Giod! Economist Cause I have a paper that has been sitting under review for 3 months. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. In my opinion, this is probably what has happened to your paper, which is why the status has changed to "Awaiting reviewer invitation. Your. What does this mean? Reviews were completed and back to the Editor? 10 years ago # QUOTE 2 Good 0 No Giod! Economist b1cc. Is it possible to be I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting Reviewer Scores This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again As a Reviewer of a manuscript, your input is a crucial part of the peer review process. I'm aware of the typical workflow of a journal. Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. My manuscript was at the 'Waiting for Reviewers' Scores' status before moving to 'Awaiting CE Decision. ' The journal has only had the manuscript for a month. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 30%, which is My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. (Awaiting Reviewer Effective February 15th, 2024, all author and reviewer accounts MUST use institutional email addresses. 2. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. Password After the status 'Awaiting reviewer scores,' the status changed to 'Revision,' and the status is still active. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). It may be that one journal uses the term “in review” and another the term “under review”, both to signify the same thing: that your Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. If you didn't see "under review", then the editor is making a decision without consulting reviewers, which is usually a bad sign. What does "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" mean within the context of a ScholarOne submission system? 3. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and If it has been "under review" for some time, then yes - the external reviewers are done. 我可以肯定的是不一样: 我曾经投稿Oxford press期刊, 先是under review,经过一月有余,变为Awaiting Reviewer Scores ,然后很快(4天后)给出审稿意见. IEEE Access strives to maintain an expedited peer review process of only 4 to 6 weeks, however, all article submissions still undergo a thorough peer review process to ensure only high-quality articles are published. I've recently contacted the editor about the status of the manuscript on 8-Apr-2019 and he replied that he is waiting for an overdue review, the the reviewer wa chased on 5-Apr-2019. Your article So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the invitation. . Post Send Post » Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li. For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, In my case there is no information about EIC but only ADM and the paper is "under review". I submitted my manuscript to a journal. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". Yesterday I checked the paper and the status had changed to “awaiting final decision”. So what is the status if it is sent to referees? 4 years ago # QUOTE 3 Good 0 No Giod! Economist • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make What is peer review? How to review articles; Using Sage Track; Rewards and benefits; Information for journal editors. Is that the only reason the date changes? I have heard that if the editor accesses the reviewers coments and when a reviewer send his comments the date changes also. However, under the regular submission system, the status is "Decision Pendin Skip to main What does "Awaiting 我可以肯定的是不一样: 我曾经投稿Oxford press期刊, 先是under review,经过一月有余,变为Awaiting Reviewer Scores ,然后很快(4天后)给出审稿意见. Thank you very much for accepting to be a part of the IJRR peer review process! (To volunteer to be a reviewer, please contact directly an Associate Editor in the Editorial Board who is in your area of expertise. Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same day it changed back to "Under Review". Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? these are the statuses, respectively, for when the paper is in peer review (‘Awaiting reviewer scores’) and after (‘Revision’). But my question is as below. Sage Track; Journal After ten more days i. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I . I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! What does "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" mean within the context of a ScholarOne submission system? 1. If your manuscript is at this stage, then I submitted a paper to a journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. After ten more days i. Post It was under review for two months. ). So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. then the EIC would be the one to evaluate the manuscript. The manuscript status was first displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the review. Cover letter for journal submission (math) 1. However, today, Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. 3. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. If difficulties arise in finding appropriate reviewers, in getting a review from a particular reviewer who already agreed to review a paper, having too many papers to handle, or having a family emergency or major The ‘pending review’ or ‘under review’ statuses indicate the current stage of your application. Economist c2bd. Such subjects include: scalable and effective algorithms for data mining and data warehousing, mining data streams, mining multi-media data, mining high-dimensional data, mining text, Web, and semi Thanks. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting SE Recommendation Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting EIC Decision Reject && Resubmit Reviewer Comments: There were a total of 35 comments from four reviewers and the Technical Editor (TE). Under review --> some journals seem to use this for every stage of peer review. Review of Economic Dynamics Thread: 0 Goods vs 0 No Goods; Home » Economics » Economics Discussion. Awaiting Reviewer Score(s) in ScholarOne. I was thrilled because I thought that might mean I'll get an answer Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. ' The Back To Top. ” However, reviewer selection happens much faster in case of revised There is the distinct option of "under review" so how is awaiting Reviewer Score(s) different? 6 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 4725. I have naturally seen the status "under review" when the manuscript goes to the process review for others journals. Some reviewers will ask for a longer period of time; if the request is reasonable, please grant it. " I am not able to understand the status of my paper. However, the • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. " Does this mean that my manuscript needs to go through another round of review? (1) Awaiting Admin Processing: 这是稿件顺利投出后的第一个状态，此时稿件由期刊秘书处理，如果稿件有问题，那么秘书会直接拒掉；如果形式审查没问题，秘书会将稿件送主编（Editor-in-chief，EIC）进一步处理 In the ScholarOne system (one of Taylor & Francis journals), the manuscript status is "Under Review". Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. ’ Please help me understand these status changes. Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review, awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision How much should I help, awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. Submitting Your Manuscript Manuscripts should be submitted online at the ScholarOne Manuscripts site for Management Science. In your example, although a "market order" would seem to be an object, it's really an action: "The placing (or execution) of the market order is I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Yes, but the question is under review by whom. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. . Immediately after submission, one ADM was assigned, but MAL ADM (an abbreviation that is not known to me) was not assigned, and the status was I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Answered August 14, 2017 - Outreach Specialist (Former Employee) - Telehealth Solutions. This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. In these cases we’d request that you accept the review, and be appropriately critical, per below. I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. If your manuscript is at this stage, then enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate it and we just need to wait for the reviewers to return their comments so that a decision can be taken. it can't be the same. So, if you mean Now, 12 hours later, it's reading Awaiting ME Decision plus Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores. Once the adequate number of reviewers have accepted the invitation, the status should change to “under review. If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to approach an additional I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Hi everyone, I am a bit confused and wanted to bug you about something. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ happened earlier, they initially decided to send it for review, but changed their mind, and decided to Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. If that is the case, then the paper will go under review again and the time taken can be much longer. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Awaiting Reviewer Scores. The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". Still the status is same. After two more days the status changed to "Under Review. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Awaiting EIC decision must have appeared after the first status while you did not check your status! It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. Under Review and Under consider: Under Review is Recruiting is reviewing your application and under consideration is the next step with the manager of My manuscript status changed from ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation,’ but the same day, it went back to ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores. Okay, it has been sent for review again. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. My paper has been on second round of revision (R&R) with this journal for 4 months, when I sent an email to ask for what is going on, I just saw the status I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) welcomes papers on a full range of research in the knowledge discovery and analysis of diverse forms of data. The online tracking system status was as follows: 17 Apr: New submission 18 Apr: Editor assigned 08 May: Under review 27 May: Reviews completed 29 May: Under review 06 Jun: Under review 25 Jun: Reviewers assigned. " Required Reviews Complete After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. The editor is awaiting feedback/ opinion from the reviewer. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Please notice that in your Author Center you may check the current status of your manuscript such as: In EIC office, Assigned to AE, AE invites reviewers, AE assigns reviewers, Under review, Awaiting AE decision, and Awaiting EIC decision. Commented Jun 30, 2019 at 11:20. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. – Shibli. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. But today suddenly the status changed back to I submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. It means it is under review by another reviewer, since one of the comment from the reviewers was not related to you paper. e around two months from the submission date, I got a mail stating "I have received all the required reviews, which I will now evaluate before making a decision" and the status changed to "Ready for Decision". What does this mean? Please help. Then in 3 weeks it was "awaiting reviewer reports" and yesterday finally "awaiting editorial decision". Also be available to answer questions and explain how to find answers if the question has stumped you. 5. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Role of the journal editor. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Then, changed to Awaiting AE rec. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". " Once the reviewer accepts the invitation, the status will change to "Under review" once again. TMI’s average turnaround time, from initial submission to decision, is about 7-weeks. Awaiting Reviewer Scores Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. 21, awaiting AE decision. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Now it is almost 3 weeks. Peer review times vary per journal. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. There are two bullet points that have remained unchanged for about 8 weeks now - one saying 'awaiting reviewer scores' and the other saying 'awaiting recommendation'. The ‘Completed’ field indicates that the ‘Thank you for submitting your review’ e-mail should send when the reviewer has returned I submitted a paper to some journal. Anecdotally, my experience is that actions are "pending" (that is, the action isn't happening yet, but will happen after whatever is "pending") while objects are "awaiting" (that is, no action is implied; the action is the review). The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Awaiting Editor Decision. Scores and Quality Ranking. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. Economist 02fc. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". Same. From awaiting reviewer scores to reviewer selection under way. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. ’ After a week, it changed to ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating Meaning of the Under Review status in the ScholarOne system Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. So, keep • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. If you can, be on hand to talk through the piece of homework. After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. It is my very first paper (co-authored) so this process is quite new to me. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. I submitted my manuscript via ScholarOne and within 2 days my status went from "editor assigned" to "under review". This means that the manuscript has been sent for peer review and the peer review has likely been completed, and now the journal is awaiting the final scores from the reviewer/s. " This status has not been changed for a month. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using the ScholarOne system. Economist acf3. Don't mean to be mean, but you are probably overthinking this. I submitted a manuscript to ScholarOne about 10 weeks ago. Yes, but the question is under review by whom. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. What does "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" mean within the context of a ScholarOne submission system? 22. The My paper underwent a revision. awaiting reviewer scores. ’ After that, it has been ‘Under Review’ for eight weeks. Not sure if the previous reviewer rejected it or had conflicting opinions, need to include a review comment. MS > JFE 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Reply. also a second CONTENTS Logging Into Your Editor or EIC Center. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. " Required Reviews Complete If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Review of Economic Dynamics; Home » Job Market » Finance Job Rumors. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. Probably a desk reject from the AE that may have been slowed due to holidays. Is this common in scientific journals? I submitted others manuscripts to other journals and the review process was different. Answer: The term "Awaiting Reviewer" means that the Editor has sent invitations to two or more reviewers for reviewing your manuscript but the Editor has still not received any response from them. So, the reviewers will share their comments with the Associate Editor On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? the manuscript will be forwarded to the reviewers. My paper was under review for two days and now is 'Awaiting AE Recommendation'. 10 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Giod! Oh, if that is true then what does "under review" mean? Really? I don't think so. When you submit a research manuscript for peer review, the journal may report the status of the review as “in review” or “under review”. Stages of Peer Review Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision. In this case, you will notice that the duration of Under Review is relatively short for 1-2 weeks. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. Per your agreement with the Associate Editor, you should complete the review within 10 days. There was no "under review" status in between. I’m not able to meet my supervisor at the moment as they are away. What can this mean? The platform is Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. Related reading: What does a change from "awaiting editorial decision" back to "under review" mean? I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. a) Is it If the date changes and it’s still under review means that less than two accepted and others have been invited. I'm relatively new to publishing and I get I'm probably overthinking this. Ok, so you’ve agreed to review the paper. Thanks though. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. This stage lasted one day and now, I am waiting for the final decision. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". 6. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Hence, there was nothing to worry about. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Under review vs. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". This guide is intended to give an overview of the Reviewer function in ScholarOne Manuscripts. This is why Antonin Scalia's death was such a great loss, who is left to tell people to just read the goddamn words. In such instances, the editor seeks an alternative reviewer to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. Under review means the AE has it but it is not yet sent out for reviewer scores. 2. (1) Some journals carry an internal review firstly before sending the manuscript for external review. I didnt see the "under review You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor (s) and might still be rejected without review. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? This subreddit is for all those interested in working for the United States federal government. For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. I recently submitted a manuscript to a reputed computer science (CS) journal that follows the ScholarOne workflow system. Could you please tell me what is the meaning of under review and Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. What does this mean? Does it imply a desk reject? Meaning of double statuses on ScholarOne: Awaiting ME Decision and Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor What does "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" mean within the context of a ScholarOne submission system? 3. What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. This has happened several times. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". From a purely grammatical perspective there’s not much difference between the two terms. It means that the peer review is over, taking about two months, and the peer reviewer recommendations are awaited on the paper. And, if they feel it lacks novelty or is not appropriate to be published in the journal, they give their decision against it. Information for IJRR Reviewers. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). --我的理解是: under review是审稿的前面阶段, Awaiting Reviewer Scores 是审稿的后面阶段,表示审稿即将结束. The primary goal of IJRR is to serve the robotics community by selecting, enhancing and publishing the top scientific and I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The status is shown as “awaiting reviewer selection” apparently because the editor is still waiting for reviewers to accept the invitation to review. Researchers. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? 6. It means its under review. Review guidelines. The Review Process The steps below are the high-level steps in the review process. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. However, if the two casings do indeed mean different statuses, ‘Under review’ could mean the internal review (by the associate editor) and ‘Under Review’ could mean the external review (by the peer reviewers). Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory; Reviews completed --> self-explanatory; With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. What is the role of processing editor in a journal submission? Hot Network Questions The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. What does this indicate? 2. Skip to main content. But the editor, for some reason, e. IMPORTANT NOTE: By submitting a manuscript to or reviewing for this publication, your name, email address, and affiliation, and other contact details the publication might require, will be used for the regular operations of the publication, Awaiting Reviewer Score(s) in ScholarOne. 15-6. The status has been changed to Awaiting Reviewer Scores in the same week I created the submission. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. Support your research; Students. Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. Note that once completed reviews for your submitted article have been received and are under evaluation by the 2022/06/12 Under review 2022/06/13 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2011/06/28 No updates. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The two casings for ‘r’ may be due to an internal input difference at the time of creating the statuses in the system. What's the difference? 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 066f. However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the need for an additional review. If the reviewers respond that they will review your manuscript, the status will change to "Under Review". If it’s just been one day, then it means the journal is assigning it to an AE, or the AE is evaluating it to send for review or to desk reject. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. 6 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 0377. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. You must complete your review online using the features of an electronic manuscript management system “ScholarOne Manuscripts™” (S1M) which has individual pages for each IEEE journal. Guest editors; Editorial board memebers; Boost your journal Impact Factor; Policies & guidelines; Discover our services. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at My supervisor and I are currently awaiting the outcome of a paper we submitted a few months ago. Thanks! Here’s a process and then a format that I recommend in this case. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". But the actual scale range can be completely arbitrary for each reviewer, including the number of gradations between individual scores. The journal uses ScholarOne Manuscripts for online submission. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Within less than two months it came for minor revision. orgot F . I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. However, there is a slight difference between them. How long I should wait for the final verdict? Awaiting reviewer scores. Typically, a higher score indicates a higher quality sample. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. g. Can you confirm? Edit: in my case, it is for a revised paper. What does this status mean? My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to Awaiting AE Decision". yqek avdgeu cjewgg rycgcq cqcch fjlrb svtxv fly wavb jgvhis